I played through this game for the first time recently, and I think this guy is the only character in the game I can think of who has no corrupting qualities that I am aware of and potentially passes the admirable standards through helping the Knight defeat Uumuu and sacrificing himself to break Monomon's seal. I haven't played Silksong yet, so I don't know how that game affects the admirable standards of this series.

1- Hiccup Horrendous Haddock III(DreamWorks) X Elsa(Frozen)

2- Son Gohan(Dragon Ball) X Chibiusa(Sailor Moon)

3- Sora(Kingdom Hearts) X Madoka Kaname(Madoka Puella Magi)

4- Spider-Man(The Spectacular Spider-Man 2008) X Ruby Rose(RWBY)

5- Izuku Midoriya(My Hero Academia) X Nezuko Kamado(Demon Slayer)

6- Jack Frost(Rise of the Guardians) X Rapunzel (Tangled)

What's your opinion? Do you like the pairs shown in the list?

I mean, sure, Winston Deavor from Incredibles 2 is a very selfless character who genuinely wants to bring superheroes back and even risked his life to help when Evelyn tried to ruin the supers' reputation, but he seems to have one jerkish moment in the movie.

When Elastigirl comes to Winston's office to complain about how Screenslaver is still at large, Winston can be seen talking to someone on the phone about how they hung up on him before and then he hangs up on them out of spite. It doesn't seem like something a Pure Good hero would do without remorse.

Jack Darby and Spider-Man (PG) and Starscream and Green Goblin (PE) Have The Same Voice

The NPE/PE wikis have added silly categories so why don't we add a good counterpart?

Amber Lee Connors, the English voice actor for Furina de Fontaine in Genshin Impact used to be married to Howard Wang, but they have now separated for some reason. Wang voiced Yomi Hellsmile in the English dub of Master Detective Archives: Rain Code, who is coincidentally, Pure Evil.

Megamind's page on Near Pure Good Wiki is updated since the sequel and series are not confirmed to be canon. So only information regarding the original movie remains on his page. In that case, the same thing also applies to Roxanne Ritchi and Minion. Does anyone disagree?

Example: Anne Boonchuy.

I recall how Anne has improved throughout the series. She went from a selfish doormat who hates school, teamwork, and responsibility, to a selfless, confident, mature woman who is taking responsibility for her actions, working with others as a team, accepting people for who they are, and giving her teachers a second chance. Plus, she became a protector of Earth and Amphibia. It's like a surprise.

Another Example: Miguel Rivera.

For a kid who tried to run away from his music-hating family to become like his great-great-grandfather, Miguel was surprisingly unexpected.

Is there a chance Invincible will be re-proposed as a PG?

Yes, I know it's been proposed and rejected, but many characters on this wiki were also rejected first and then approved. The main argument used in the proposal is that Mark was too lethal for PG, having brutally murdered Onaan, but I feel the context wasn't properly analyzed. Both Thraag and his sons were ACTIVELY trying to kill Mark and his family, with Thraag brutally murdering Oliver in front of Terra. Onaan himself had sadistically taunted Mark that he would kill Terra. And even so, Mark didn't kill Onaan outright, offering Thraag the chance to leave in exchange for leaving him and his family alone. Instead of accepting, Thraag mocked Mark, saying that because he was a hero, he wouldn't kill, and therefore he and his allies would die. Only then, when Thraag made it clear he wouldn't stop, did Mark kill Onaan.

As later revealed, Onaan was essentially a petty psychopath who led his victims to a pit to torture them to death. The only one who mourns his death is his sister Ursaal, and even she admitted that her brother was a monster.

Overall, I'd say that while the way Mark killed Onaan was brutal (crushing his neck), I'd say it was justified in the context of self-defense.

To emphasize my point, I want to compare this moment with the moment when Obi-Wan allows Captain Rex to kill the Guardian Agruss. Just as Thraag did with Mark, Agruss taunted Obi-Wan about not being able to kill him because of the Jedi Code, which prohibits a Jedi from killing a defenseless opponent. Obi-Wan responds by letting Captain Rex kill Agruss.

In other words, in both situations, we have the villain taunting the hero about not being able to kill because of their heroic ideals, only for the hero in question to respond by killing the villain.

Why, then, is Agruss considered justified in the case of Obi-Wan and Rex, while in the case of Mark and Onaan, it is considered "excessive"?

But anyway, that's just my opinion. So, with the points I raised, do you still think Mark is too lethal, or is it justified?

Only character I can think of is Optimus Prime from transformers one until darkwing almost punched him

Together with their condition.

Because they desire to feel empathy