Pure Good Wiki

Proposal(s) to vote on:


  • TBA


Removal(s) to vote on:

  • TBA

READ MORE

Pure Good Wiki
Pure Good Wiki
Approved

Copied over from his PoH Proposal that was made by yours truly.

What is the work?

Dayshift at Freddy's is a series of satirical RPG Maker games created to parody the popular indie series, Five Nights at Freddy's. It revolves around Jack Kennedy, and his many misadventures within the Fazbear branch, with there being many goofs and gaffs, as well as many moments where it gets genuinely emotional to the point of possibly bringing you to tears, and this guy right here, is kind of a balance of both.

Who is he? What has he done?

The Real Fredbear serves as one of the overarching protagonists of this series. An angelic like figure who brought Jack Kennedy back to life under the conditions of him bringing the lost and restless souls their happiest day, The Real Fredbear essentially serves as the main reason for why the main plot of this series happened at all, with him bringing Jack back to life and thus, allowing him to visit and work for Freddy's.

In most of the games' routes, The Real Fredbear serves as Jack's ally, helping him achieve the Happiest Day whether it is by using himself as a distraction or fighting against Davetrap. However, within the evil route of the second game, he will become your greatest adversary, with him rolling in and attempting to kill Jack after he broke his promise to save them.

Either way, no matter the route you take, the Real Fredbear serves as one of the greater goods of this series, with his number one goal being to bring the souls who had their lives taken from them their happiest day, allowing them to be at peace.

Admirable Standards?

Not much of an issue here. The Real Fredbear is literally the whole reason Jack came back and gave everyone their happiest day. something of which he made him promise, which essentially means he is responsible for almost every good deed that Jack does in this series, safe to say he passes the standards.

Mitigating Factors?

He was kind of responsible for Jack's first death due to his suit being the thing to springlock him. However this is hardly corrupting as not only does he apologize for this, but he also gives him a second chance at life.

He seems to think rather highly of himself with how he refers to his springlocks as "glorious". But this isn't really out of arrogance, and beyond that, he is one of the most selfless and noble characters in the entire series.

In terms of other stuff, he does get angry at Jack and insult him during the evil route as well as trying to kill him, but this is pretty waranted since Jack turns into a complete monster during these routes, safe to say this is justified.

Finally, the series states that he is "the concept of childhood" which could imply moral agency issues, but this is too vague for me to consider it anything. And even beyond that, the other endings in this series show that he does understand right and wrong, so I think he is fine in this category.

Verdict?

Gonna go with a yes.